Proefschrift_vd_Beek

REFERENCES

Anderson, I, Weichbold, V., D’Haese, P. (2002). Recent results with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant and TEMPO+ behind- the-ear processor. Ear, Nose & Throat Journal , 81 , 229–233 Bosman, A. J., Smoorenburg, G. F. (1995). Intelligibility of Dutch CVC syllables and sentences for listeners with normal hearing and with three types of hearing impairment. Audiology , 34 , 260–284 Cord, M. T., Surr, R. K., Walden, B. E., Dyrlund, O. (2004). Relationship between laboratory measures of directional advantage and everyday success with directional microphone hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology , 15 , 353–364 Dawson, P. W., Decker, J. A., Psarros, C. E. (2004). Optimizing dynamic range in children using the nucleus cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing , 25 , 230–241 Fetterman, B. L., Domico, E. H. (2002). Speech recognition in background noise of cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery , 126 , 257–263 Firszt, J. B., Holden, L. K., Skinner, M. W., Tobey, E. A., Peterson, A., Gaggl, W., Runge-Samuelson, C. L., Wackym, P. (2004) Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems. Ear and Hearing , 25 , 375–387 Friesen, L. M., Shannon, R. V., Baskent, D., Wang, X. (2001). Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 110 , 1150–1163 Frijns, J. H., Briaire, J. J., de Laat, J. A., Grote, J. J. (2002). Initial evaluation of the Clarion CII cochlear implant: speech perception and neural response imaging. Ear and Hearing , 23 , 184–197 Frijns, J. H., Klop, W. M., Bonnet, R. M., Briaire, J. J. (2003). Optimizing the number of electrodes with high-rate stimulation of the clarion CII cochlear implant. Acta Oto-laryngologica , 123 , 138–142 Fu, Q. J., Galvin, J. J. III. (2001).Recognition of spectrally asynchronous speech by normal hearing listeners and Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109:1166–1172. Fu, Q. J., Shannon, R. V., Wang, X. (1998). Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 104 , 3586–3596 James, C. J., Blamey, P. J., Martin, L., Swanson, B, Just, Y., Macfarlane D. 2002. Adaptive dynamic range optimization for cochlear implants: a preliminary study. Ear and Hearing, 23 , 49S–58S. Laszig, R., Aschendorff, A., Stecker, M., Muller-Deile, J., Maune, S., DillierN., Weber, B., Hey, M., Begall, K., Lenarz, T., Battmer, RD., Bohm, M., Steffens, T., Strutz, J., Linder, T., Probst, R., Allum, J., Westhofen, M., Doering, W. (2004) Benefits of Bilateral Electrical Stimulation with the Nucleus Cochlear Implant in Adults: 6-Month Postoperative Results. Otology and Neurotology , 25 , 958–968 Luts, H., Maj, J. B., Soede, W., Wouters, J. (2004). Better speech perception in noise with an assistive multimicrophone array for hearing AIDS. Ear and Hearing , 25 , 411–420 Muller, J, Schön, F., Helms, J. (2002). Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant system. Ear and Hearing , 23 , 198– 206 Parkinson, A. J., Arcaroli, J., Staller, S. J., Arndt, P. L., Cosgriff, A., Ebinger, K. 2002. The nucleus 24 contour cochlear implant system: adult clinical trial results. Ear and Hearing 23 , 41S– 48S.

2

Plomp, R. (1977). Acoustical aspects of cocktail parties. Acustica , 38 , 186–191

Ramsden, R. T. (2004). Prognosis after cochlear implantation. British Medical Journal , 328 , 419–420

37