Proefschrift_vd_Beek

REFERENCES

Abbas PJ, Brown CJ, Etler CP: Utility of electrically evoked potentials in cochlear implant users; inWaltzman SRT (ed): Cochlear Implants, ed 2. New York, Thieme, 2006, pp 96–107. Adunka OF, Pillsbury HC, Adunka MC, Buchman CA: Is electric acoustic stimulation better than conventional cochlear implantation for speech perception in quiet? Otol Neurotol 2010; 31:1049–1054. Allum JH, Greisiger R, Probst R: Relationship of intraoperative electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds to maximum comfortable loudness levels of children with cochlear implants. Int J Audiol 2002; 41:93–99. Alvarez I, de la Torre A, Sainz M, Roldan C, Schoesser H, Spitzer P: Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor. Ear Hear 2010; 31:134–145. Bento RF, De Brito Neto RV, Castilho AM, Gomez MV, Sant’Anna SB, Guedes MC, Peralta CG: Psychoacoustic dynamic range and cochlear implant speech-perception performance in Nucleus 22 users. Cochlear Implants Int 2005; 6(suppl 1):31–34. Bierer JA, Faulkner KF: Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves. Ear Hear 2010; 31:247–258. Blamey PJ, Pyman BC, Gordon M, Clark GM, Brown AM, Dowell RC, Hollow RD: Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992; 101: 342–348. Bonnet RM, Boermans PP, Avenarius OF, Briaire JJ, Frijns JH: Effects of pulse width, pulse rate and paired electrode stimulation on psychophysical measures of dynamic range and speech recognition in cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2012; 33:489–496. Bosman AJ, Smoorenburg GF: Intelligibility of Dutch CVC syllables and sentences for listeners with normal hearing and with three types of hearing impairment. Audiology 1995; 34: 260–284. Botros A, Psarros C: Neural response telemetry reconsidered. I. The relevance of ECAP threshold profiles and scaled profiles to cochlear implant fitting. Ear Hear 2010; 31:367– 379. Boyd PJ: Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant. Ear Hear 2006; 27:608–618. Boyd PJ: Evaluation of simplified programs using the MED-EL C40+ cochlear implant. Int J Audiol 2010; 49:527–534. Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM: The relative value of predictive factors of cochlear implant performance depends on follow-up time; in Briaire JJ: Cochlear implants from model to patients; thesis, Leiden, Leiden University, 2008, pp 161–162. Brown CJ: Clinical uses of electrically evoked auditory nerve and brainstem responses. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 11: 383–387. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Fryauf-Bertschy H, Kelsay D, Gantz BJ: Intraoperative and postoperative electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses in Nucleus cochlear implant users: implications for the fitting process. Ear Hear 1994; 15:168–176. Brown CJ, Hughes ML, Lopez SM, Abbas PJ: Relationship between EABR thresholds and levels used to program the CLARION speech processor. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1999; 177:50–57. Brown CJ, Hughes ML, Luk B, Abbas PJ, Wolaver A, Gervais J: The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear Hear 2000; 21:151–163. Cafarelli DD, Dillier N, Lai WK, et al: Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system. Audiol Neurotol 2005; 10:105–116. Caner G, Olgun L, Gultekin G, Balaban M: Optimizing fitting in children using objective measures such as neural response imaging and electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold. Otol Neurotol 2007; 28:637–640. Fayad JN, Makarem AO, Linthicum FH Jr: Histopathologic assessment of fibrosis and new bone formation in implanted human temporal bones using 3D reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 141:247–252. Finley CC, Holden TA, Holden LK, Whiting BR, Chole RA, Neely GJ, Hullar TE, Skinner MW: Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29:920–928. Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH: Linear mixed effects model; in Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH(eds): Applied Longitudinal

5

111